General
Posted by Samantha Serfass on February 7, 2020 in Epic, General
Chief Medical Information Officer
Illinois
Since 2010, Excite Health Partners has been a growing leader in the Healthcare consulting and staffing industry. We are committed to the development of the HIT industry, which is why we ensure our employees are educated, prepared and confident. We understand our employees are the backbone of our company, so we work to find the best fit position for each of our unique professionals.
Qualifications
At Excite, we want you to succeed. We want to help you reach your goals and find a satisfying and challenging work environment. For the Chief Medical Information Officer, you should meet the following criteria:
• Must have at least 5 plus years’ Epic experience
• Previous experience with Epic build focused in provider governance, change control and data analytics
• Strong communication skills and experience working with C-level suite executives
• Must have previous experience leading a team of providers through an Epic install
• Medical degree from a US Medical Healthcare Institution
• Must be able to commit to an 18-month contract
• Completed Epic Builder Physician Training, a plus
Joining the Team
Excite understands that employees are the cornerstone to our success. We are proud to offer the following benefits:
• Competitive compensation
• Health, Vision, Dental plan
• Life and long-term disability
• 401k plan with designated company match
• Weekly pay
Posted by Samantha Serfass on January 31, 2020 in Blog, General, News
Breaking It Down: EGD with Endoscopic Ultrasound
Esophagogastroduodenoscopies with endoscopic ultrasound examination
can appear rather confusing, especially when additional procedures such as fine
needle aspirations or injections of adjacent structures are also performed in
tandem with the original procedure.
The first thing to remember is that all of the Upper EUS
codes are subsets of the parent code, 43235 Esophagogastroduodenoscopy. If you look at the code book, all of the
codes under 43235 start with “with”.
Keeping this in mind, you will realize it is always assumed that an
entire EGD has been performed (esophagus, stomach, 2nd portion of
duodenum) prior to the insertion of the echoendoscope. Also note that there is a separate code for
esophagoscopy with EUS, meaning the stomach and/or duodenum is not entered with
the scope.
For the purpose of the EGD’s with EUS, the GI system is broken down into three basic regions:
- Esophagus
- Stomach
- Duodenum (or surgically altered stomach where
the jejunum is examined distal to the anastomosis)
The next thing to distinguish is the subtle verbiage
differences in the code descriptions, namely AND versus OR, which helps
identify the best code for the operative scenario. For these procedures, the word “and”
(esophagus, stomach, AND either duodenum or surgically altered stomach…) means
that all three regions have to be evaluated using ultrasound. When “OR” is used, the intent is to reflect
that two out of the three regions are evaluated. Typically, 43237 is used when the EUS probe
is inserted through the esophagus and into the stomach, but does not reach the
duodenum.
Of note, it is also assumed that adjacent structures are
always visualized during an ultrasound, even though the only codes that
specifically state “and adjacent structures” are 43237 and 43238. Adjacent structures is defined as not only
the walls of the GI tract, but other structures such as the liver, biliary
tract, pancreas, lymph nodes.
When determining the correct code assignment, remember that the code descriptions for endoscopic ultrasound refer specifically to the ultrasound probe, and the depth to which it is inserted. A complete esophagogastroduodenoscopy has to be performed prior to the EUS in order to correctly choose a code from this section as evidenced by the code format contained in the CPT book.
CODES WITH THEIR DEFINITIONS:
| 43235 |
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy |
| 43237 |
with EUS limited to esophagus, stomach or duodenum and adjacent structures |
| 43238 |
with EUS with fine needle aspiration (Includes EUS limited to esophagus, stomach, or duodenum and adjacent structures) |
| 43242 |
with EUS with FNA (includes EUs of esophagus, stomach, and either duodenum or surgically altered stomach where the jejunum is examined distal to the anastomosis) |
| 43253 |
with EUS guided transmural injection of diagnostic or therapeutic substance (includes EUS exam of esophagus, stomach, and either the duodenum or a surgically altered stomach where the jejunum is examined distal to the anastomosis) |
| 43259 |
with EUS including the esophagus, stomach, and either the duodenum or a surgically altered stomach where the jejunum is examined distal to the anastomosis |
For additional uses for EUS, check out Excellent Endoscopy.
Robyn McCoart, RHIT
Managing Auditor, Excite health Partners
Posted by Samantha Serfass on December 19, 2019 in Blog, General, News
SPLIT/SHARED SERVICES: THE IMPORTANCE OF PROPER DOCUMENTATION
When an E/M service is performed in the hospital inpatient (POS 21), hospital outpatient (POS 19, 22), or emergency department (POS 23) and is shared between a physician and non-physician practitioner (NPP) from the same group practice, the service may be billed as a split/shared E/M service.
The CMS definition of split/shared visits can be found in
the CMS Internet Only Manual (IOM): Medicare Claims Processing Manual
Publication 100-04, Chapter 12, Section 30.6.1 Split/Shared E/M Visit:
“A split/shared E/M visit is defined by Medicare Part B
payment policy as a medically necessary encounter with a patient where the
physician and a qualified NPP each personally perform a substantive portion of
an E/M visit face-to-face with the same patient on the same date of
service. A substantive portion of an E/M
visit involves all or some portion of the history, exam, or medical decision-making
key components of an E/M service. The
physician and the qualified NPP must be in the same group practice or be
employed by the same employer.”
The following documentation requirements must be met in order to report the service as split/shared:
- Both the physician and the NPP must provide a face to face encounter with the patient.
- Each clinician must document a note in the medical record. Typically, the NPP note is more extensive, but that is not a requirement.
- Physician must document at least one element of the history, exam, and/or medical decision- making component of the E/M service. It is not sufficient for the physician to simply document “seen and agree” or simply countersign the non-physician practitioner (NPP) documentation.
- Physician must legibly sign the documentation.
- Physician and the NPP must be actively involved in the Medicare Program and both have a valid provider number for reporting purposes.
The level of E/M service selected to report is based on both
the physician and NPP documentation.
If any of the above elements are lacking, then the service
will be reported using the NPP’s NPI.
This will result in a reduction in payment for the E/M service as NPPs
receive 85% of the fee schedule rate, whereas reporting using a physician’s NPI
number will receive 100% of the fee schedule rate.
The following services may not be reported as split/shared services:
- Critical care services-this is a Medicare rule. Do not combine time for critical care services done by a physician and NPP, even when working in the same group, same specialty.
- Procedures are performed by one person. Report under the NPI number of the clinician who performed the service.
Remember that physician supervision alone is insufficient for split/shared services, proper documentation is the key!
Janice Spaulding, CCS CPC
Auditor, Coding Educator Excite Health Partners
Posted by Samantha Serfass on October 28, 2019 in General
In The Know: Coding the Petersen Space
Did
you know that an internal hernia can occur in a Petersen space? But what is a
Petersen space?
Petersen
space is the defect space that can sometimes occur in the mesentery between the
alimentary loop of a gastrojejunostomy and the lower part of transverse colon
mesentery after a gastric surgery.1
One
of the complications that can arise following any type of gastrojejunostomy is
a Petersen space hernia.
A
Petersen space hernia can develop “when the intestinal loops protrude through
the defect between the small bowel limbs, the transverse mesocolon and the
retroperitoneum.” 2
The
hernia can occur anywhere from days to years after a gastric bypass.
Because
it is an internal hernia, it is usually not visible thru the abdominal wall
(i.e. protrusion like ventral hernias or umbilical hernias) and symptoms
include severe abdominal pain and sometimes obstruction.1
Because
of the increasing prevalence of gastric bypass, the occurrence of a hernia in
Peterson’s space is more common than it used to be. Prior to this, it was typically only seen in
the small amount of cases where a bypass was performed after gastric resection
for things like severe ulcers and stomach cancer.
How do you code repair of a Petersen
Space hernia?
In
the coding scenario for a laparoscopic repair of an internal Petersen space
hernia presented in AHA Coding Clinic for
ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2018, the correct ICD-10-CM PCS code would be
“0DQV4ZZ Repair of mesentery, percutaneous endoscopic approach.” 3
If an
open repair of the mesentery is performed for a Petersen Space hernia the
appropriate PCS code would be 0DQV0ZZ Repair of mesentery, open approach.
Be sure and read the whole Operative Report description of the procedure for accurate code assignment.
Lorrie Strait, RHIT, CCS
Manager HIM Services
References:
1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articles › PMC319962
2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210261211000447
3. AHA Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2018
Posted by Samantha Serfass on August 29, 2019 in Additional Vendors, General, Job
Desktop Support Engineer
Evansville, IN
Since 2010, Excite Health Partners has been a growing leader in the Healthcare consulting and staffing industry. We are committed to the development of the HIT industry, which is why we ensure our employees are educated, prepared and confident. We understand our employees are the backbone of our company, so we work to find the best fit position for each of our unique professionals.
Qualifications
At Excite, we want you to succeed. We want to help you reach your goals and find a satisfying and challenging work environment. For the Desktop Support Engineer position, you should meet the following criteria:
- At least 3 years desktop or network support experience
- Technical background experience
- Basic Technical Certified (A+ or Network +etc.)
- Previous experience with installation/support for hardware, operating systems & computer software
- Troubleshoot network & server issues
- Offer Tier 2 support for entire Network
- EMR/ Healthcare experience, preferred
- Strong verbal, organizational and written skills
- Bachelor’s degree or related field experience
Joining the Team
Excite understands that employees are the cornerstone to our success. We are proud to offer the following benefits:
• Competitive compensation
• Health, Vision, Dental plan
• Life and long-term disability
• 401k plan with designated company match
• Weekly pay
Posted by Samantha Serfass on August 28, 2019 in Epic, General, Job
Epic Integration Leader
Detroit,
MI
Since 2010, Excite Health Partners has been a
growing leader in the Healthcare consulting and staffing industry. We are
committed to the development of the HIT industry, which is why we ensure our
employees are educated, prepared and confident. We understand our employees are
the backbone of our company, so we work to find the best fit position for each
of our unique professionals.
Qualifications
At Excite, we want you to succeed. We want to help you reach your goals and find a satisfying and challenging work environment. For the Epic Integration Leader position, you should meet the following criteria:
- At least 3 years Epic Integrations experience (at multi-hospital system)
- Experience implementing new Epic modules
- Experience managing and overseeing interface configurations based on specific workflows
- Experience coordinating and supervising logistics
- Strong critical thinking and leadership skills
Joining the Team
Excite understands
that employees are the cornerstone to our success. We are proud to offer the
following benefits:
- Competitive compensation
- Health, Vision, Dental plan
- Life and long-term disability
- 401k plan with designated company match
- Weekly pay
Posted by Samantha Serfass on June 11, 2019 in General
Cerner CoPath Analyst
Pittsburgh, PA
Since 2010,
Excite Health Partners has been a growing leader in the Healthcare consulting
and staffing industry. We are committed to the development of the HIT industry,
which is why we ensure our employees are educated, prepared and confident. We
understand our employees are the backbone of our company, so we work to find
the best fit position for each of our unique professionals.
Qualifications
At Excite, we want you to succeed. We want to help you reach your goals
and find a satisfying and challenging work environment. For the Cerner CoPath
Analyst position, you should meet the following criteria:
Joining the Team
Excite understands that employees are the cornerstone to our
success. We are proud to offer the following benefits:
- Competitive compensation
- Health, Vision, Dental plan
- Life and long-term disability
- 401k plan with designated company match
- Weekly pay
Posted by Samantha Serfass on March 19, 2019 in Blog, General, News
BREAKING DOWN DENIALS: CC/MCC DENIALS
When someone in the healthcare industry hears the word
“denial”, many things can come to mind.
There are many different types and kinds of denials; what could be said
about denials could fill a book. To narrow the conversation, let’s touch on one
specific type of denial that has become more prevalent for hospitals in recent
years.
A documented and coded diagnosis
acting as a CC or MCC for the DRG is denied by the payer with the claim that
the clinical picture does not support that it is a true and valid
diagnosis. By removing the diagnosis
code, the DRG is reduced, resulting in a reduced payment to the hospital.
This type of denial has been called various things which can create confusion when assigning the appropriate person to address it.
A few examples are:
- “clinical denials” which could also mean denial
of admission to an inpatient bed stating the patient’s clinical picture does
not warrant inpatient care
- “DRG denials” which could also mean the entire admission
was denied, not just a denied diagnosis changing the DRG
- “Coding denials” which tends to sound like this
is a coder issue when in fact it is not a coding issue at all
Payers have learned how to target the types of inpatient
discharges that lend well to this type of challenge. Common targets include DRGs with a single CC
or MCC where the CC or MCC is acute renal failure/injury, acute respiratory
failure, encephalopathy, malnutrition, or sepsis.
If this is not a coding specific issue, then where does the
problem lie? The Center for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS) has not stated any one criterion as the official
clinical criteria for all to follow. As
a result, many payers including the RACs have created their own criteria or adapted
existing criteria in the industry such as AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network),
RIFLE (Risk, Injury,
Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease), or KDIGO (The Kidney Disease:
Improving Global Outcomes). Providers most
often do not know what individual payer criteria is being used. Physicians have not been educated on when
additional documentation is needed to support certain conditions that they
diagnose and document.
The coding teams are stuck in the middle. Facilities can trend what different payers
are targeting and the basis of their denials.
Armed with this information, coders still cannot diagnose the
patient. Even with outlined criteria to follow, conditions
documented in the record and not ruled out cannot be ignored by the coder. The coder cannot make the determination that
a documented diagnosis is not valid and choose not to code it.
What’s a hospital to do?
Hospitals should create a team to review these types of denials and
fight back whenever possible. Some
hospitals have taken the extra steps to create internal clinical guidelines to
give direction and promote consistency; however, payers may still deny
diagnoses based on their own criteria.
Offer as much education on the issue as possible to physicians, CDI
staff, and coders.
Who should review and argue the cases? The best person to
review these denials and write up an appeal letter would be the very person
that documented the diagnosis in question, the physician. However, it is a rare hospital that has a
medical staff member with the time and willingness to do so. So, the task should fall to someone with
strong writing skills with a clinical background that can create a strong
argument in support of a documented diagnosis by outlining the patient’s
clinical picture in detail.
From a different angle: Coding was initially created for the
primary purpose of statistics and research.
Coded data can play a key role in value-based care and other programs
based on patient care outcomes and quality of care indicators. While Official Coding Guidelines offer clear
direction on when to assign a secondary diagnosis code, the guidelines could be
a part of the problem. The guidelines
state additional conditions are coded when they affect patient care by
requiring clinical evaluation, therapeutic treatment, diagnostic procedures,
they extended the length of stay, or necessitate increased nursing care and/or
monitoring. But what the guidelines
neglect to include are conditions that create a patient health risk for the
future.
One example includes patients with morbid obesity
that decline nutritional counseling or any other type of intervention. Because the condition is not being addressed,
some payers are denying it as a secondary code/s. As patients develop obesity related
conditions in the future, there will be limited data for research of obesity
related health problems because the condition of obesity is not being coded
now. This also could create a problem
with quality of care analysis when patients’ conditions are uncontrolled due to
unaddressed obesity such as diabetes, respiratory conditions, joint problems,
and cardiac disease.
Every denial should be reviewed and where possible and appropriate, challenged. Payers may tend to target facilities that do not argue or fight back. Do not accept a payer’s denial at face value. Review the case. If there is enough clinical support in the record to argue, do so. The continued challenge is what constitutes “enough clinical support”? Not even CMS answers that for us.
Lisa Marks
VP of HIM Services
Posted by Samantha Serfass on February 19, 2019 in Blog, General, News
FLU SEASON’S HERE – Coding Respiratory Influenza
Every year, influenza season is considered to stretch from
October through May. The peak occurs
between December through February, causing a lot of hospital encounters—
whether as inpatients, emergency department visits, or physician office visits.
Within the medical world, there are different types of
influenza viruses. In order to reflect
the type of influenza appropriately, the coding professional must carefully
examine the documentation provided by the physician in order to assign the
correct influenza code. Within this
article, we will discuss the different types of influenza and the
documentation/coding nuances for each.
Sometimes the type of influenza will not be identified, but
the physician will still document “influenza” and treat it as such. Within the alphabetical index, this would be
considered an unidentified influenza virus (J11.x). Other times, the physician will order a nasal
swab and it will come back positive for Influenza A or Influenza B. In these cases, the influenza would be
indexed as Influenza, identified influenza virus, NEC (J10.x).
Novel A Influenza virus is considered to be an influenza
arising from animal origin, and is actually somewhat rare. Some of the key words the physician must
document in order to assign a code for Novel A are: “novel”, “avian”, “swine”, “H1N1”,
“H5N1”. The inclusive list of sub terms
can be found within the alphabetical index and are also listed in the tabular
index under J09. X. These codes can only
be assigned on confirmed cases of Novel Influenza because these are nationally
reported infectious diseases. If the
physician uses equivocal terms such as “possible” or “probable” a code from the
J09 section should not be assigned and the physician should be queried for
clarification.
There are times when the coder will see documentation of
“influenza like illness”. In the
alphabetical index, there is a specific entry for this, which directs the coder
back to the main term of influenza.
Because there is a specific alphabetical index entry, this diagnosis is
appropriate for assignment on both inpatient and outpatient cases.
Under all specified influenza types, there is a subset of
manifestations defined by the word “with”.
Referring back to the Official Coding Guidelines for ICD-10-CM and PCS,
the diagnoses listed under the term “with” are assumed to be linked and can be
coded as such (i.e., influenza with pneumonia).
It’s important to remember chart documentation is critical when assigning the appropriate code for influenza. The coder should carefully review the alphabetical index entries and assign the most appropriate code. Remember that Novel A Influenza and Influenza A are not the same. Influenza A is most common, whereas Novel A Influenza is rather rare.
Robyn McCoart
Director of Client Services, Excite Health Partners
Posted by Samantha Serfass on January 7, 2019 in Additional Vendors, General, Job
Senior Project
Manager – Shaker Heights, OH
Since 2010, Excite Health Partners has been a growing leader
in the Healthcare consulting and staffing industry. We are committed to the
development of the HIT industry, which is why we ensure our employees are educated,
prepared and confident. We understand our employees are the backbone of our
company, so we work to find the best fit position for each of our unique
professionals.
Qualifications
At Excite, we want you to succeed. We want to help you
reach your goals and find a satisfying and challenging work environment. For
the Senior Project Manager position, you should meet the following criteria:
- At least 7 years of project management
experienced, required
- Project Management Professional (PMP), preferred
- Build and implement Lean process workflows –
project & portfolio management
- Identify and resolve issues and conflicts within
various project teams
- Assist department talent management: talent
selection, conduct performance reviews, maintain team dynamics
- Strong communication, organizational and
leadership skills
- Bachelor’s degree or related field experience
Joining the Team
Excite understands that employees are
the cornerstone to our success. We are proud to offer the following benefits:
- Competitive compensation
- Health, Vision, Dental plan
- Life and long-term disability
- 401k plan with designated company match
- Weekly pay